Catholic thoughts for the Everyday Catholic.
I recently had the opportunity to write a guest blog on The Simple Catholic. The post is about three ways the newly baptized can live their vows going forward. You can read the post here. Lastly, check out and follow The Simple Catholic for great content. Matthew is doing great work over there.
The Epistle of James is a work that is written the diaspora and possibly Christians that are conservative in their appreciation for Judaism (Brown, 726). James is best known for its description of faith in relation to works in chapter two. James 2:17 states “So faith by itself, if it has no works, is dead.” Also James 2:24 states “You see that a person is justified by works and not by faith alone.” James basically says that if you say you are a Christian there better be something to substantiate your claim. Anyone can say they are a follower, but the proof needs to be made manifest in how we treat others, and how we help alleviate the suffering of other members of the Christian body. Brown states “In any period outsiders judge Christians by the commonsense standard of 2:26 that faith without works is dead; for them it would be a case of putting one’s money where one’s mouth is (Brown, page 731).
Another Catholic epistle is short but deals with those who stray from the faith, and that is the Epistle of Jude. Most scholars think that it was written to Christians in Palestine due to the “brothers of Jesus” reference. Jude is harsh and to the point when it comes to contending for the faith. Jude’s approach to teaching the faith is to be harsh and condemning of those who stray. The advice is good, but it is necessary to be aware of how Jude delivers it. According to the text it seems that intruders, or false teachers, have infiltrated the priesthood and corrupting the Eucharistic meal. Brown states “The most interesting image is that of corrupting the love feasts, since it reminds us of the early Christian agape meals, linked to the Eucharist (Brown, page 752).” The epistle calls us to stand fast and stand up for what we believe in. Jude 3 states “Beloved, while eagerly preparing to write to you about the salvation we share, I find it necessary to write and appeal to you to contend for the faith that was once for all entrusted to the saints.”
Works Cited
Brown, Raymond, An Introduction to the New Testament. New York: Doubleday, 1997
The Trinity is a complex subject, and at times is very misunderstood. Some try to rationalize and fall into error by declaring a type Tritheism, or even Modalism. However, the persons of the Trinity are three persons of one essence. The Trinitarian Godhead is made up of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit and all within the Trinity are two processions.
To understand this further it is helpful to define what a procession is. Within God there is a two-fold procession as was mentioned earlier. A procession is a general origin of one thing from another. There are two types of procession by which something can come. The first type of procession is known as Ad Extra. This type of procession speaks of something final springing from another. A good example of this would be a human father producing a son. From a theological perspective this is when something springs from God because God is the cause. The second procession type is Ad Intra, and this procession happens when something remains within its principal.
As previously stated, there are two typed of procession within the Trinity. It is also important to note that though different processions are present does not mean that there are different natures. Regarding this Garrigou-Lagrange state, “In the divine processions, for example, there is no diversity of nature (the nature remains numerically the same) but only a diversity of persons according to the opposition of relation” (Garrigou-Lagrange Introduction).
The Father proceeds from no one, and simply is because he has always been. The Father was never created nor begotten, but he does have the operations to know and to will (Lecture Notes). From these operations the Son and the Holy Spirit proceed respectively. To some this may seem that the Son and the Holy Spirit were somehow created? If that is the case then Church History needs to make amends with those who were condemned for heresy, but this is not the case. All are God, and it is from the Father that the Son and the Holy Spirit proceed in God (Garrigou-Lagrange Ch. VII).
The Son proceeds from the Father for all eternity through generation. This type of procession we can see in several places in sacred scripture and also tradition. One such passage is John 1:18 which states, “No one has ever seen God. It is God the only Son, who is close to the Father’s heart, who has made him known” (NRSV). Here we see the generation procession that indicates the special relationship and all-knowing nature of the Son. It is through him that we can have a knowledge of the Father. It is the Father’s principle that is being imitated, and this is because they are one essence (Garrigou-LaGrange Ch. VIII). In the tradition of the church, that is through the councils and writings of the early fathers, there is a constant teaching about the nature of Christ in relation to the Father. That teaching is that the Son is consubstantial and of the same substance of the Father, even though he is begotten. One cannot be begotten and consubstantial at the same time. The Son is the Son because he proceeds from generation.
The procession of the Holy Spirit varies from that of the Son. That is because the third person of the Trinity proceeds from the Father and the Son through spiration and as one principle (Lecture Notes). This is also seen in sacred scripture and tradition. One such verse is John 15:26 which states, “When the Advocate comes, whom I will send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth who comes from the Father, he will testify on my behalf” (NRSV). This passage shows that the Spirit proceeds from the first two, and this is supported in early church writings from St. Augustine, St. Ambrose, and the Councils of Florence and Lyons.
Works Cited
Garrigou-Lagrange, Reginald. The Trinity and God the Creator. https://www.ewtn.com/library/THEOLOGY/TRINITY.HTM#00, accessed November 27, 2018.
In the early church many were attempting to understand the divinity of Christ, and in extension the Holy Trinity. Today, we have the benefit of the Church correcting false ideas. However, when these ideas were formulated there was not a dogmatic decree regarding the Trinity though the dogma had been taught in the earliest days of the church. The heresies of Monarchianism, Sabellianism, Subordinationism, and Arianism required that the church formally formulate the Trinitarian doctrine.
Dynamic Monarchian ism taught that the Father was true God, and that Christ was a man who was indwelled with a divine spirit (Preuss 126). Patripassian Monarchianism takes it a step further by acknowledging Christ as divine but does not go far enough as the two are not of the same substance. Sabellianism, or Modalism as it is also called, taught that God manifested himself in different modes and that there was only one person of the Godhead. In short, God was made up of one person (Garrigou-Lagrange Ch.5). Arianism denied the divinity of Christ and taught that He was a creation of the Father, and this was also the Arian view of the Holy Spirit. In that regard, he was subordinate to the Father. The heresies mentioned all have elements of subordinationism, because in various respects the divinity of Christ and the Holy Spirit is lowered.
With these heresies being taught the souls of the faithful were at risk. The church rightly saw that an attack on the persons of the Trinity was a salvific issue. Afterall, if Christ was not fully divine then his sacrifice on the cross meant little or nothing. The church responded to the heresies, and formally defined the Trinity at the Council of Nicea in 325.
Works Cited
Garrigou-Lagrange, Reginald. The Trinity and God the Creator. https://www.ewtn.com/library/THEOLOGY/TRINITY.HTM#05, accessed November 13, 2018.
Preuss, Arthur. The Divine Trinity. https://archive.org/details/divinetrinityad00pohlgoog, accessed November 12, 2018.
Now there are varieties of gifts, but the same Spirit; and there are varieties of services, but the same Lord; and there are varieties of activities, but it is the same God who activates all of them in everyone. – 1 Corinthians 12:4-6
I was on social media a couple months ago and came across a post that shocked me. It shocked me because you can sense by the tone that she was hurting. Her tweet basically said that she has nothing to offer to the church. This post was heartbreaking, and it had me wondering how many other people within the church may feel like this. A priest responded with reassurance that she has a gift that nobody else in her church may have. The next response was from a Southern Baptist pastor who said that there is no gift or deed to small, and that God can use anything for his glory. It was encouraging to see over two hundred comments encouraging this individual.
What is the point of all of this? In today’s passage we read that the Holy Spirit gives different gifts to different people. No organization can function if everyone was doing the same thing, and the church is no different. We all can’t be pastors or teachers. Yes, sometimes those gifts get all the attention but if you ask any pastor, they would say that there is so much more going on behind the scenes than people may realize. This was the point of the Apostle Paul to the Corinthian church. Charles Spurgeon once said that the greatest gift that one could give him was to pray for him. We can certainly do that a little more, thee are things in the church that can always be cleaned, Sunday School to be taught, ushers, greeters, and people to put together the bulletin. There is no gift that is too small, and every gift is needed.
So what gift do you possess that could be used for the benefit of the church? At the church I grew up in there was a woman named Delores who greeted everyone with a smiling face. She made everyone feel welcomed, and when she passed to her eternal reward over 500 people attended her funeral. Her story is a perfect example of something that seemed small, but had a huge impact for the kingdom. Perhaps your gift is the same. Let it shine and let God turn it into something that helps bear fruit for his kingdom. You have a gift that we all need and the Lord will utilize it in a way that you can’t even begin to fathom.
Prayer: Lord Jesus I humbly asked that you take the gift I have and use them for your glory. Help me to understand what my gift is and submit it to your service.
In the very beginnings of sacred scripture we read of the Lord creating. Each step of creation ended a similar way with the words by describing their goodness. In Genesis 1:31 God had just finished creating man and commanded them to procreate and exercise dominion over the Earth. Genesis 1:31 states, “God saw everything that he had made, and indeed, it was very good. And there was evening and there was morning, the sixth day” (NRSV).
Humanity was created uniquely different than the rest of creation. God created humans with the ability to reason, with five senses to help us learn, and free will. The combination of these work together to help us live in harmony with each other, in harmony with our creator, and assist us finding true happiness. The intellect we were blessed with helps us rationalize. Our intellectual knowledge originates in the five senses and internal sensory powers of common sense, estimation, memory, and imagination.
This intellectual knowledge that develops helps us form our will. The purpose of the will is to direct action and direct the concupiscible and irascible appetites. The concupiscible appetites are things like love, joy, desire, and sadness. They work together to help us seek what is good and reject evil. The irascible are attributes such as hope, courage, despair, and fear. These attributes assist us in avoiding evils in which we may find compelling. Together the concupiscible and irascible appetites are known as the sense appetites, and work to help us understand what is good and what is evil. They help us establish the parameters in which we exercise the freedom which God has given us. Regarding this freedom Servais Pinckaers writes, “It is the power to engage in excellent actions, actions that are true and good, even though the agent may in fact fail and do evil” (Pinckaers 68).
Looking back on my life I can see how these senses led me in the right direction. How they allowed me to see what was right, what was the right path, and how I ignored it. I think of an incident from my childhood in which I wanted a piece of candy at a store and was told no. I wanted the candy and ate it in the middle of the store without paying. I knew it was wrong and the senses mentioned above were telling me it was wrong. However, I ignored them and partook in larceny to have that which I longed for.
This ignoring of what was supposed to be done made matters worse. This is the effect of sin on the individual. Every sin wounds the communion that we have with our creator. Mortal sin goes a step further in that it ruptures the relationship completely. For something to be a mortal sin it must meet the following three criteria: It must involve grave matter, the individual must have full knowledge that it is sin, and there must be a deliberate consent to the act. This is obviously not God’s will, and it is by doing God’s will that we find the happiness that we long for. This is what James Keenan means when he writes, “Not only does love look for union, it also moves us toward freedom and truth. Love then makes possible our search for a freedom for greater love and a truth to love rightly” (Ostrowski 27).
Works Cited
Ostrowski, Thaddeus ed. Primary Source Readings in Christian Morality. Saint Mary’s Press. Winona, MN: 2008. Print
Pinckaers, Servais. Morality: The Catholic View. St. Augustine’s Press. South Bend, IN: 201. Print.
In sacred scripture we read that man was created he had a perfect relationship with God. Man is the pinnacle of creation, and God gave man everything. In return the Lord asked man not to each of one tree in the garden. Man did not listen, rebelled, and had to face the consequences of sin for the first time. The sin of our first parents also applies to us. We all have sinned, and the penalty for that sin is death. Saint Paul had the same opinion in Romans 6:23 which states, “For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord” (NRSV). However, the second person of the blessed Trinity, Jesus himself became incarnate to atone and redeem us from our sin.
The incarnation was needed because we could not atone for our sin on our own. Only someone who was perfect, and without sin could do that. This perfect sacrifice, Jesus, would also show us the new law of grace. A way of living, or new law of grace, shows us a deeper understanding of the law. It shows us how it was supposed to be lived from the beginning, and the divine Son of God, showed us how to live it. The new law is an interior, infused reality consisting in the grace of the Holy Spirit, received through faith in Jesus Christ and operating through charity. These virtues, which are also taught in 1 Corinthians 13, are faith, hope, and charity.
Since becoming a catholic these three virtues have been instrumental in my life. Faith is at the forefront, and the will of Christ is sought in everything that I do. Faith is the starting point for the New Law, and “the starting point for Christian morality” (Pinckaers 85). As a father of four, a husband, and one income life throws many curve balls. Things have not been easy, but my wife and I maintain our hope in Christ. It is this hope, through faith, that help us persevere and see the good even in the roughest circumstance. No matter how tight things are we see that there are those who are having much larger problems than ourselves. We strive to be good disciples, by not only having faith in Christ, but by also having charity. We trust God for our needs but realize that we are commanded to love our neighbor as ourselves and strive to help whenever possible. We have found that the practice of the infused virtues has deepened our faith and love for our fellow man.
Works Cited
Pinckaers, Servais. Morality: The Catholic View. St. Augustine’s Press. South Bend, IN: 2001. Print.
The Trinity is a mystery that is dogma and must be believed for one to call themselves a Christian. This is a leap of faith, because though we know it is true, we are not able to understand everything about it. Do we need to understand everything about it in order to believe? Some would say that to believe we must have absolute knowledge of the subject. To not have this knowability is a contradiction in eyes of many.
There are many things that we have knowledge of, but we do not know absolutely. The medical field is constantly changing and filled with new advances, but just a few decades ago the damage of cigarettes on the human body was not well known. Is this a contradiction in the medical field? Do we not adhere to the advice of our doctor because we do not have an absolute knowledge of his field? To have that line of thinking borders on insanity.
There is no tension between the trinity and its knowability. The Trinity was revealed very slowly in scripture because to reveal it right away would lead Israel into Tritheism. They simply would not have understood it. The members of the Trinity were together at one time at the baptism of Christ, and Christ mentioned all three. For those who have issues believing the Trinity, St. Augustine asks a very interesting question. Do you believe Jesus rose from the dead though you have never seen anyone else do the same (Augustine 7.5)? We love the Lord Jesus though we have never seen him, and we love the other members of the Trinity as well. We see the handiwork of the Trinity all around us. The Trinity is one God with three persons, and we love them because they are God. It does take an element of faith like most things in life. That illumination that faith provides assists in understanding it a bit more. If we fully understand everything there is to know about God, then he ceases being God.
Works Cited
Augustine of Hippo. Philip Schaff. (Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1887.) Revised and edited for New Advent by Kevin Knight. <http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/130101.htm>, accessed November 11, 2018.
In the early church many were attempting to understand the divinity of Christ, and in extension the Holy Trinity. Today, we have the benefit of the Church correcting false ideas. However, when these ideas were formulated there was not a dogmatic decree regarding the Trinity though the dogma had been taught in the earliest days of the church. The heresies of Monarchianism, Sabellianism, Subordinationism, and Arianism required that the church formally formulate the Trinitarian doctrine.
Dynamic Monarchianism taught that the Father was true God, and that Christ was a man who was indwelled with a divine spirit (Preuss 126). Patripassian Monarchianism takes it a step further by acknowledging Christ as divine but does not go far enough as the two are not of the same substance. Sabellianism, or Modalism as it is also called, taught that God manifested himself in different modes and that there was only one person of the Godhead. In short, God was made up of one person (Garrigou-Lagrange Ch.5). Arianism denied the divinity of Christ and taught that He was a creation of the Father (Lecture Notes), and this was also the Arian view of the Holy Spirit. In that regard, he was subordinate to the Father. The heresies mentioned all have elements of subordinationism, because in various respects the divinity of Christ and the Holy Spirit is lowered.
With these heresies being taught the souls of the faithful were at risk. The church rightly saw that an attack on the persons of the Trinity was a salvific issue. Afterall, if Christ was not fully divine then his sacrifice on the cross meant little or nothing. The church responded to the heresies, and formally defined the Trinity at the Council of Nicea in 325.
Works Cited
Garrigou-Lagrange, Reginald. The Trinity and God the Creator. https://www.ewtn.com/library/THEOLOGY/TRINITY.HTM#05, accessed November 13, 2018.
Preuss, Arthur. The Divine Trinity. https://archive.org/details/divinetrinityad00pohlgoog, accessed November 12, 2018.
